In an illustrated lecture, Osbaldeston will explore never-realized planning, transit and architectural schemes in and around Toronto, from the city’s founding to the 21st century on Thursday, December 4 at 7:00 pm in the Museum’s Signy and Cléophée Eaton Theatre. The free lecture explores such questions as where city council would debate today if Viljo Revell hadn’t won the 1958 competition to design the new City Hall, why a parcel of downtown land known was known for two decades as the “Mystery Block,” and why there is a Queen Street ghost station.

Mark Osbaldeston has written about architecture and city planning for the National Post and Eye Weekly, and has reviewed architecture books for Quill & Quire and Azure. A lawyer, he has practiced in both the private and public sectors. He lives in Toronto.

The Institute for Contemporary Culture (ICC) at the Royal Ontario Museum (ROM), in partnership with the Toronto Society of Architects (TSA) presents this exhibition, in which juried images of unbuilt projects from practicing architects and designers are juxtaposed against historical images of unrealized building proposals drawn from Mark Osbaldeston’s forthcoming book, Unbuilt Toronto: A History of the City That Might Have Been (Dundurn Press, November, 2008). Presented in two parts, the exhibition consists of historical images – covering more than 150 years and as selected from Osbaldeston’s book. ROM visitors will be exposed to proposals for ambitious and often controversial projects such as the Civic Improvement Committee’s proposed Federal Avenue of 1911, Eaton’s 1928 stand-out College Street tower, and “Project Toronto,” Buckminster Fuller’s futuristic plan for the city from 1968. The exhibition also features images of more contemporary unrealized projects for Toronto, many of which have never before been seen by the general public. The Toronto Society of Architects has invited designers, large and small, to submit unrealized architectural, landscape or urban design projects that might have resulted in a very different city from the one seen today. To ensure potency of dialogue, the contemporary projects submitted must have had substantial potential for realization within the Greater Toronto Area: each project had a client, was part of an invited submission, or was shortlisted for a competition. Final selection by the TSA’s curatorial panel of architects, educators and urbanists will be based on design excellence, the context for cancellation, and the significance of impact had the project been realized.